Laboratory tests of 13 sanitary pads reveal significant differences in performance and sustainability. The pads were evaluated for absorbency, skin dryness, fit, and renewable material content. Absorption capacity and dryness were key factors, with results differing greatly between products. Many of the tested pads contain superabsorbent materials that effectively lock in moisture, while others lack these components and perform worse.
The test also highlights variations in the environmental impact of the pads, with renewable material content ranging widely. While many pads are made from fossil-based materials, some products successfully include higher proportions of sustainable components. The Carbon-14 method was used to analyze the renewable material content.